Liberty at all hazards must be supported.

History Corner

Presidential Election 1876

As the year 1876 came to a close, the presidential election was supposed to be decided. Except it wasn’t. Instead, disputes over the election outcome would continue all the way through March 1877. It was ugly — but it could have been even worse.
The Electoral College helped the country that year in an unexpected way; it isolated election disputes to only four states. Without the Electoral College, every vote in every state could have been contested. Would things have spun completely out of control?
They truly could have. In those post-Civil War years, the nation was starkly divided between North and South. Many Southerners were still chafing under the restrictions of Reconstruction. Fraud and dishonesty were too pervasive. Black voters were sometimes denied access to the polls. At least one study has concluded that a “fair and free election” would have turned out differently in 1876.
In other words, the scene was set for a hotly contested political contest. Republicans had nominated Rutherford B. Hayes, the Governor of Ohio. Meanwhile, Democrats had nominated Samuel J. Tilden, the Governor of New York.
The results on Election Day couldn’t have made anyone happy. Hayes appeared to have about 250,000 fewer popular votes, nationwide, than Tilden; however, the all-important electoral vote was still up for grabs. Twenty electors were disputed in four states. In Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina, state officials couldn’t agree on who had won. Thus, multiple slates of electors were submitted from each of those states. One electoral vote in Oregon was also disputed. Hayes needed all 20 of these electors to win. Tilden needed just one.
Can you imagine what CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC would do with such a situation today?!?
Americans in 1876 didn’t have the benefits of such modern technology, of course. Instead, they waited for weeks to see which candidate would be declared the victor. The situation prompted plenty of political grandstanding!
The Senate was then controlled by Republicans, while the House was controlled by Democrats. No one knew what to do about the conflicting sets of election returns, but Congress finally created a (constitutionally questionable) Electoral Commission. That committee was supposed to be evenly divided, with seven Republicans, seven Democrats, and one independent Supreme Court Justice. It didn’t turn out that way. Instead, Independent Justice David Davis was unexpectedly elected to the Senate by the Illinois state legislature. His spot on the commission was taken by Justice Joseph Bradley, a Republican appointee.
Unsurprisingly, the Republican-controlled Commission soon decided all 20 disputed electoral votes in favor of Hayes, throwing the election to him.
Naturally, Democrats were upset, and a filibuster nearly sidetracked congressional acceptance of the Commission’s findings. Eventually, though, Congress brokered a compromise: Republicans indicated that they would be willing to bring Reconstruction to an end. In return, southern congressmen began withdrawing their objections.
Hayes was finally declared the winner of the election at about 4:00 a.m. on March 2. Of course, action came about mostly because Congress had its back up against a wall: Only two days then remained in President Ulysses S. Grant’s term.
After all the turmoil, Rutherford B. Hayes was finally sworn in as the country’s 19th President on March 4, 1877.
Credit to: Tara Ross. This Day in History

Become a Patriot Partner

All proceeds go toward educating our nation’s youth in the founding principles of our nation and the responsibility of good citizenship.

Recent Posts

1801 – The Barbary Wars Begin

On August 1, 1801 Lieutenant Andrew Sterrett, in command of the U.S. Navy frigate Enterprise, defeated the corsair Tripoli in an engagement off the North African coast. In the engagement, the Tripoli lost sixty out of eighty crew members, while the Enterprise...

A Republic, If You Can Keep It

In medieval times every castle had a Keep. The Keep was where the most valued articles were maintained. Not just the gold, jewels and silver, but the documents and charters that described the character of the kingdom and its history. It was a place highly fortified...

Can we again draw a lesson from France?

Can we again draw a lesson from France? Absent a CLEAR, UNAMBIGUOUS understanding of the Law’s just purpose; a yardstick against which people can measure their government's every act, those entrusted with the force of law will naturally advance their own authority. A...

The Cyclical Process of Climate Change

Much has been made about the government's recently-released report on climate. As expected, this government-funded presentation of a narrative that all-but demands greater power to central government is being treated as the indisputable last word on the matter of...

America’s First Valentine’s Day Letter

    On February 14, 1779, the first recorded Valentine's Day letter in America was given by, then, British Lieutenant Colonel John Simcoe to Sarah “Sally” Townsend. Here is the first of three verses..."Fairest Maid, where all Is fair, Beauty’s pride and...


“The philosophy of the schoolroom in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next.”~ Abraham Lincoln That quote from Lincoln was a warning for future generations. He was saying how can we expect to keep a government of, by and for the people when...

A Gathering of Minds – Food For Thought

A Gathering of Minds – Food For Thought by Michael Murphy | Jan 14, 2017 | Conservatism, Michael Murphy, opinion, Our Team, Politics, Politics Feature, U.S. Politics, z Home Feature Mid Right Blog Wednesday evening, I had the pleasure of gathering in a large room...

Welcome To The Civics Practice Test!

The civics practice test is a study tool to help you test your knowledge of U.S. history and government. Use this online tool to prepare for the civics portion of the naturalization test. 

This practice test contains 20 questions.

Mid-Term Election - November 8, 2022