Liberty at all hazards must be supported.

History Corner

Presidential Election 1876

As the year 1876 came to a close, the presidential election was supposed to be decided. Except it wasn’t. Instead, disputes over the election outcome would continue all the way through March 1877. It was ugly — but it could have been even worse.
The Electoral College helped the country that year in an unexpected way; it isolated election disputes to only four states. Without the Electoral College, every vote in every state could have been contested. Would things have spun completely out of control?
They truly could have. In those post-Civil War years, the nation was starkly divided between North and South. Many Southerners were still chafing under the restrictions of Reconstruction. Fraud and dishonesty were too pervasive. Black voters were sometimes denied access to the polls. At least one study has concluded that a “fair and free election” would have turned out differently in 1876.
In other words, the scene was set for a hotly contested political contest. Republicans had nominated Rutherford B. Hayes, the Governor of Ohio. Meanwhile, Democrats had nominated Samuel J. Tilden, the Governor of New York.
The results on Election Day couldn’t have made anyone happy. Hayes appeared to have about 250,000 fewer popular votes, nationwide, than Tilden; however, the all-important electoral vote was still up for grabs. Twenty electors were disputed in four states. In Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina, state officials couldn’t agree on who had won. Thus, multiple slates of electors were submitted from each of those states. One electoral vote in Oregon was also disputed. Hayes needed all 20 of these electors to win. Tilden needed just one.
Can you imagine what CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC would do with such a situation today?!?
Americans in 1876 didn’t have the benefits of such modern technology, of course. Instead, they waited for weeks to see which candidate would be declared the victor. The situation prompted plenty of political grandstanding!
The Senate was then controlled by Republicans, while the House was controlled by Democrats. No one knew what to do about the conflicting sets of election returns, but Congress finally created a (constitutionally questionable) Electoral Commission. That committee was supposed to be evenly divided, with seven Republicans, seven Democrats, and one independent Supreme Court Justice. It didn’t turn out that way. Instead, Independent Justice David Davis was unexpectedly elected to the Senate by the Illinois state legislature. His spot on the commission was taken by Justice Joseph Bradley, a Republican appointee.
Unsurprisingly, the Republican-controlled Commission soon decided all 20 disputed electoral votes in favor of Hayes, throwing the election to him.
Naturally, Democrats were upset, and a filibuster nearly sidetracked congressional acceptance of the Commission’s findings. Eventually, though, Congress brokered a compromise: Republicans indicated that they would be willing to bring Reconstruction to an end. In return, southern congressmen began withdrawing their objections.
Hayes was finally declared the winner of the election at about 4:00 a.m. on March 2. Of course, action came about mostly because Congress had its back up against a wall: Only two days then remained in President Ulysses S. Grant’s term.
After all the turmoil, Rutherford B. Hayes was finally sworn in as the country’s 19th President on March 4, 1877.
Credit to: Tara Ross. This Day in History

Become a Patriot Partner

All proceeds go toward educating our nation’s youth in the founding principles of our nation and the responsibility of good citizenship.

Recent Posts

A Republic, If You Can Keep It!

A Republic, If You Can Keep It by Bill Boillot. January 14, 2017 The importance of knowing history cannot be overstated.  History helps us to understand the present. People have largely neglected the power of history.  Understanding history brings the basic knowledge...

Learn the past to Understand the future

By Bill Boillot, 12/20/2016 Would you really like to learn more about the history and vision of the Founding Fathers and the documents they created but didn’t know where to turn?  Does knowing how your government is supposed to operate matter? Do you want to be...

The Case For Enumerated Powers

The Case For Enumerated Powers by Michael Murphy | Dec 19, 2016 Our founding fathers were not stupid men, nor did they wake up one day and decide Great Britain was causing problems and decided to revolt. The idea of liberty was not something that one day popped into...

Little Known Lady Patriot

Lydia Barrington Darragh (1728-1789) Lydia Barrington Darragh was a Philadelphia Quaker who became a Patriot spy during the American Revolution. Her courageous efforts helped prepare General George Washington for an attack by the British in December 1777. Born in 1729...

Samuel Adams and the Stamp Act.

Samuel Adams and the Stamp Act. On this day on November 1, 1765 the Stamp Act takes Effect. Sugar Act, 1764 and Stamp Act, 1765 The Sugar Act and the Stamp Act imposed by the British government in 1764 and 1765 respectively, was view with a disapproval eye among...

Welcome To The Civics Practice Test!

The civics practice test is a study tool to help you test your knowledge of U.S. history and government. Use this online tool to prepare for the civics portion of the naturalization test. 

This practice test contains 20 questions.

Mid-Term Election - November 8, 2022